mt_ignore
Legal Feeds
Canadian Lawyer
jobsinlaw.ca

Letter: Apathy not the only factor in low voter turnout

With respect to your June 29 story, “A closer look at law society voting patterns,” I would respectfully point out a fact that might have caused some of the decline in the vote during the Law Society of Upper Canada bencher election.

In the 2015 election, the vote was almost solely electronic. Only those voters without an e-mail address would receive any ballot other than an electronic one.

Unfortunately, the ballot e-mail came from Computershare and not from the law society itself. Add to that the fact that it was clearly a bulk e-mail and it is likely that many copies went to junk or spam folders rather than the inbox.

In some firms, lawyers are not permitted access to their junk or spam folders. Those lawyers might never have seen the ballot at all.

Although I believe your reporting was fair, it is possible that there are factors other than apathy at play in the low voter turnout for the 2015 bencher election.
Janis Criger,
Bencher, central south

Add comment



  • Access to Justice
    Access to Justice The Action Group on Access to Justice (TAG) strives to inform the public on the importance of the people having access to legal resources and…
  • Legal Aid lawyers rally for collective bargaining rights
    Legal Aid lawyers rally for collective bargaining rights Legal Aid Ontario lawyers held three protests in July to push the provincial government to support their attempts to unionize. The lawyers have been in…
  • Jane-Finch community gets employment law help
    Jane-Finch community gets employment law help Osgoode Hall Law School's Community Legal Aid Services Programme recently opened an employment law division for Toronto's Jane-Finch community.Phanath Im, review counsel for the division,…
More Law Times TV...

Law Times poll

A Law Times columnist says criminal law is out of step and argues there should be an immediate moratorium on HIV non-disclosure prosecutions, unless there is alleged intentional transmission. Do you agree?
Yes, the unjust criminalization of people living with HIV needs to change. The law has become more draconian even as HIV has become more manageable and as transmission risks decrease.
No, the law should remain as it is, and the Ministry of the Attorney General should not change its approach.