mt_ignore
Legal Feeds
Canadian Lawyer
jobsinlaw.ca

Editorial: A tart ruling

One hopes that Ontario Attorney General Yasir Naqvi took a look at an Ontario Divisional Court ruling issued recently.

Editorial: A tart ruling
Editorial Obiter: Gabrielle Giroday
The ruling in Gilbert’s LLP v. David Dixon Inc., 2017 ONSC 1345 (CanLii) is a sharp rebuke regarding the current state of the province’s assessment office.

In the ruling, Justice Ian Nordheimer documents issues with the processes that lawyers must go through to get unpaid fees, and he also issues a reproach to the provincial government for failing to deal with the issue.

“The situation in the Assessment Office has deteriorated . . . while the number of lawyers in the Province has increased, as has the amount of legal services being provided and also, presumably, the number of written fee agreements being entered into,” he says.

Law Times reports that backlogs in the assessment office at the Ontario Superior Court in Toronto have often led to waits of more than three years before lawyers seeing fees have their matters heard by an assessment officer.

“. . . The assessment office cannot handle the demands that are currently made of it, and the problems that would be created if every written fee agreement for contentious work, had to be reviewed, through that system, before a lawyer could receive his/her fees,” says the ruling. The ruling states lawyers can bring an action in court to collect unpaid fees, as long as there is no quantum dispute.

“If there is a quantum dispute and you’re within the time frame for proceeding with an assessment, then you’re stuck with that, but if there is no quantum dispute, it seemed to be quite silly to go through this lengthy,  protracted assessment process, which, of course, wasn’t intended to be that but became that,” says Matthew Diskin, a partner with Gilbert’s LLP.

Silly, indeed. Members of the profession will be pleased to hear of a push for progress.

Add comment



  • Access to Justice
    Access to Justice The Action Group on Access to Justice (TAG) strives to inform the public on the importance of the people having access to legal resources and…
  • Legal Aid lawyers rally for collective bargaining rights
    Legal Aid lawyers rally for collective bargaining rights Legal Aid Ontario lawyers held three protests in July to push the provincial government to support their attempts to unionize. The lawyers have been in…
  • Jane-Finch community gets employment law help
    Jane-Finch community gets employment law help Osgoode Hall Law School's Community Legal Aid Services Programme recently opened an employment law division for Toronto's Jane-Finch community.Phanath Im, review counsel for the division,…
More Law Times TV...

Law Times poll

Recreational marijuana use will be legalized, and lawyers say there will be an increase in terms of criminal charges and civil cases as a result. From the perspective on how this will impact the courts, do you support pot legalization?
Yes. While there will no doubt be an impact on the courts from this change, the overall social benefits of legalization are positive.
No. The move to legalize marijuana is short-sighted, and will lead to negative social results, including longer court delays.