mt_ignore
Legal Feeds
Canadian Lawyer
jobsinlaw.ca

Editorial: Protecting sources?

Much coverage has been dedicated to the trouble the journalism industry has endured in the last decade.

And yet, there are bright spots. One sunny note is Bill S-231, in the wake of revelations from Quebec that Montreal police were spying on journalists.

As Law Times reports this week, lawyers who act for journalists would be impacted by the bill, if passed, because it ensures that only Superior Court judges can issue warrants against journalists, and it shifts the burden of proof so that the party seeking disclosure must prove why they need to compel the information from a journalist instead of the current laws, where journalists must prove why their sources should be protected.

It also includes a new provision that would require a special advocate be consulted before judges issue warrants for journalists’ materials.

The truth is that, in an era when many journalists have no access to legal advice or guidance (particularly with the growth of online publications), by the time a controversy erupts over handing over information to police, all the players involved have lost.

Journalists lose because they must burn time and resources, in an age where both are precious, on a legal battle.

Police lose because going after journalists for their materials — publicly or quietly — will not win any public opinion points in a battle with the people who write the narrative.

While reporters get bylines, the true heroes of the battle for protection of anonymous sources are legal eagles doing quiet work to make sure the law is designed to protect those brave enough to come forward.

Add comment



  • Access to Justice
    Access to Justice The Action Group on Access to Justice (TAG) strives to inform the public on the importance of the people having access to legal resources and…
  • Legal Aid lawyers rally for collective bargaining rights
    Legal Aid lawyers rally for collective bargaining rights Legal Aid Ontario lawyers held three protests in July to push the provincial government to support their attempts to unionize. The lawyers have been in…
  • Jane-Finch community gets employment law help
    Jane-Finch community gets employment law help Osgoode Hall Law School's Community Legal Aid Services Programme recently opened an employment law division for Toronto's Jane-Finch community.Phanath Im, review counsel for the division,…
More Law Times TV...

Law Times poll

In a recent report, Justice Michael Tulloch said there is ‘no reason’ why the director of the province’s Special Investigations Unit needs to be a lawyer. Do you agree with Tulloch?
Yes, there is no reason why the head of the SIU needs to be a lawyer, especially given that this is not a requirement in other places.
No, the role requires a specialized knowledge of criminal investigations, and the professional expertise a lawyer brings.