Legal Feeds
Canadian Lawyer


Motherisk case shows cracks in child welfare

An Ontario judge has found that two lawyers provided incompetent counsel while representing parents in a family law case that he said shows the broken state of the child welfare system in Canada.
Add new comment

LSUC to implement cap on referral fees

New rules approved by the Law Society of Upper Canada to further regulate advertising and referral fees are a good step in repairing any damage that may have been done by misleading advertisements to the public’s confidence in the legal profession, some lawyers say.
Add new comment

Appeal in Teva cheque fraud case to be heard this week

A major pharmaceutical company is arguing that the Ontario Court of Appeal has “altered the law” and improperly introduced a new defence for banks when determining liability in fraudulent cheque schemes.
Add new comment

Former law firm partner sued for $9 million

A Toronto litigation and corporate law boutique has sued a former partner in the firm for $9 million after a dispute over a contingency fee client.

Add new comment

Plaintiffs plan to appeal Chevron decision

The lawyers representing Ecuadorian plaintiffs in a lawsuit against Chevron Corporation have applied for leave to appeal a judge’s decision to dismiss an action against the company’s Canadian subsidiary.
Add new comment

Prosecution halted after lawyer joins Crown

A judge has stopped the Kenora Crown attorney’s office from prosecuting the case of a man, after his defence lawyer took a job as a Crown mere days before his trial was set to begin.
Add new comment

Lawyer disbarred for role in investment scheme

The Law Society of Upper Canada has disbarred a Richmond Hill, Ont. lawyer after finding she acted as an escrow agent in an illegitimate investment scheme worth $8-million.
Add new comment

Firm blocked from representing company

The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld a decision barring a Toronto firm from representing an insurance company in a coverage dispute because of a potential conflict of interest, despite the fact that the firm followed all ethical guidelines.
Add new comment

Case clarifies rules in civil jury trials

Lawyers say a recent Court of Appeal decision in a medical malpractice case clarifies a number of procedural issues in civil jury trials.
Add new comment

Police can amend tickets without notifying accused

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal ruling allows police officers to amend tickets for minor offences before they are filed in court and without notifying the accused.
Add new comment

Rule broken when records exchanged: judge

An Ontario Superior Court judge has found that the “deemed undertaking” rule was breached when two Toronto lawyers exchanged hundreds of pages of private records about a sexual assault complainant with no notice to a court, the woman or her counsel.
Add new comment

LSUC ordered to pay $1.3M to partners

Two former Torys LLP partners, who endured an 11-year-long battle with the Law Society of Upper Canada to clear their names of wrongdoing, have won $1.3 million in costs from the provincial regulator.
Add new comment
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
Page 4 of 180

  • Access to Justice
    Access to Justice The Action Group on Access to Justice (TAG) strives to inform the public on the importance of the people having access to legal resources and…
  • Legal Aid lawyers rally for collective bargaining rights
    Legal Aid lawyers rally for collective bargaining rights Legal Aid Ontario lawyers held three protests in July to push the provincial government to support their attempts to unionize. The lawyers have been in…
  • Jane-Finch community gets employment law help
    Jane-Finch community gets employment law help Osgoode Hall Law School's Community Legal Aid Services Programme recently opened an employment law division for Toronto's Jane-Finch community.Phanath Im, review counsel for the division,…
More Law Times TV...

Law Times poll

A recent Court of Appeal decision acknowledged a ‘new reality’ of civil litigation in which courts are seeing a significant number of self-represented litigants. Are courts are doing a good job of addressing the needs of self-represented litigants?
Yes, judges are doing a good job of ensuring trial fairness.
No, courts have only just begun to consider the many issues surrounding self-represented litigants.