mt_ignore
Legal Feeds
Canadian Lawyer
jobsinlaw.ca

Letters to the Editor

I am writing in response to the article “Lawyer slams costs for medical records” that appeared in the Jan. 9, 2012, edition of Law Times.
Add new comment
Last summer, I was appointed as the employer nominee to a panel that mediated/arbitrated the dispute between Air Canada and the Canadian Auto Workers.
Add new comment
In reference to Law Times’ coverage of the title insurance industry (see Title insurance wars heating up once again,” July 11), Stewart Title Guaranty Co. would like to provide further context regarding the need for an important clarification to be made.
Add new comment
I am writing in response to an article on June 6 entitled “LSUC considers counselling for returnees.
Comments (1)
Your editorial in the June 6 edition of Law Times (see “In praise of second chances”) does not, in my view, provide a complete and full picture of what occurred in relation to the 2010 motion in the Superior Court of Justice surrounding the compensation order imposed on me in my criminal matters in May 1993.
Add new comment
I appreciate the important coverage in the May 16 edition of Law Times given to the report released by the Canadian Bar Association on solicitor-client privilege (see “Alarm sounded on solicitor-client privilege”).
Add new comment
A FATHER’S PERSPECTIVE ON JOINT CUSTODY
The real problem in family law is the beliefs expressed by some lawyers that predominate in the family courts. Such views (see “Debate fires up over presumption of joint custody,” Law Times, Feb. 7) are wrong and discriminatory. But those who discriminate never see what they do as discrimination.

Add new comment
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>
Page 5 of 5

More Law Times TV...

Law Times poll

An estate trustee who took an ‘egregious' position in litigation has been ordered to personally pay more than $140,000 in costs. Will this ruling serve as an appropriate caution to executors on how they conduct themselves in litigation?
Yes, this will remind trustees of the potential exposure of significant awards being made against them personally.
No, it’s unlikely this ruling will dissuade executors from engaging in unreasonable conduct during litigation.