Tax Court of Canada


Tax

Income tax

Administration and enforcement

Penalties justified as taxpayer had made false statement or omission equivalent to gross negligence

Minister re-assessed taxpayer for taxation years 2013 and 2014 using net worth assessment. Taxpayer appealed contending that he had only omitted $3,000 in 2013 by inadvertence, that Minister had failed to include depreciation in re-assessing, and that penalties and interest not warranted. Appeal dismissed. Burden of proof was on taxpayer. Taxpayer’s account books were not trustworthy. Several numbered invoices were missing. Taxpayer had produced no non-taxable origin for increase in net worth. Auditor had taken depreciation into account. Penalties justified as taxpayer had made false statement or omission equivalent to gross negligence. Taxpayer was experienced in running a business and kept his own accounts so was in position to catch errors and omissions.

Coutu c. La Reine (2018), 2018 CarswellNat 3734, 2018 CarswellNat 3962, 2018 TCC 143, 2018 CCI 143, Dominique Lafleur J. (T.C.C. [Informal Procedure]).

Case Law is a weekly summary of notable civil and criminal court decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Canada and all Ontario courts. These cases may be found online in WestlawNext Canada. To subscribe, please visit store.thomsonreuters.ca.


Law Times Poll


Ontario Premier Doug Ford has announced that real estate lawyer Doug Downey will be Ontario’s new attorney general. Do you expect Downey to take a substantially different approach to his portfolio than his predecessor in the role?
RESULTS ❯