Legal Feeds
Canadian Lawyer

This Week's Issue

Careless driving cases show limits of POA

Alex Robinson - Monday, July 18, 2016

Edouard Le Blanc was cycling near his home in Scarborough when he was struck by a driver and died from his wounds in 2014.
What was the legal penalty for the death? The driver was charged with careless driving, issued six demerit points, and fined $700.

Lawyers say cases like Le Blanc’s highlight the limitations of the Provincial Offences Act, which governs the process for prosecuting regulatory offences.

“Just simply imposing fines doesn’t send any kind of message to the public,” says Patrick Brown, a lawyer with McLeish Orlando LLP, who is representing Le Blanc’s family in civil lawsuits.

Unlike the Criminal Code, lawyers say the act lacks a guiding rationale or principles for...

Read more

Decision should force law society to change disclosure, say critics

A recent Divisional Court decision could push the Law Society of Upper Canada to have a less rigid approach to disclosure when it comes to its disciplinary proceedings, lawyers say.

Inside Queen's Park: Ontario looking to jump into the digital age

Wanted: tech guru to transform massive organization rooted in the 1980s with bold leadership initiatives, innovation, and improved user experience. Salary: $200,000-plus a year.

Focus: Cybersecurity lawyers defend against attacks

As Canadian businesses beef up their defences against cyberattack, some of the country's biggest law firms are growing their own cybersecurity teams in an attempt to match client demand.

Inside Story

Monday, July 18, 2016

In a dramatic reversal, the Supreme Court of Canada overturned what had been called a “game-changing” decision by the Federal Court of Appeal, and ruled that non-unionized employees of federally regulated business are entitled to similar protections against dismissal as those afforded to unionized workers.

The SCC ruled six to three in the case of Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. In February 2015, the Federal Court of Appeal had held that federally regulated employers may dismiss employees without cause.

The general consensus previously was that employees governed by the Canada Labour Code could only be terminated for just cause.

The decision affects half a million non-unionized employees working in banks, telecommunications, airlines, and other federal enterprises.

“It sets the law to what we thought it was prior to the Federal Court of Appeal decision,” says Stacey Ball, of Ball Professional Corp., who was counsel for the intervener...

more Inside Story

The Law Times Daily is out! Stories via @Twimmigration @CognitionLLP @lorrainefleck
RT @ontmag: Do you know a dedicated professional/volunteer who should be nominated for a Victim Services Award of Distinction?
Court extends sentencing appeal window in terrorism case relating to #BillC24 #cdnlaw #cdnpoli via @LegalFeedsblog
The Law Times Daily is out! Stories via @LabourLawyerOtt @BennettJonesLaw @Osler_Law
Should government or business sell legalized #marijuana in Canada? via @FindlawCanada

More Law Times TV...

Law Times poll

Law Times reports some lawyers are criticizing the Provincial Offences Act, when it comes to the legal process following careless driving incidents. Do you think the POA needs overhauling for these offences?
Yes, the POA lacks consistency and is confusing when it comes to sentencing. It definitely needs updating.
No, the way the POA currently works is just fine. There are more pressing things that need attention from our legislators.